RAM – Risk Assessment Matrix

By | 2018-01-03T10:57:05+00:00 February 6th, 2017|Risk Assessment|0 Comments


Guidance for Use of the RAM

The starting point for a RAM assessment is an understanding of the Hazard in its context (activity, location etc.), or an understanding of the particular potential incident being considered.

HSE Risk Assessment Matrix

An assessment consists of the following steps.

Step 1 Identify potential consequences (credible worst case scenario)

Identify the consequences that could result from a release of the Hazard under the prevailing conditions. Ask the question: “What could happen if the controls don’t work or they fail?”

For example, the operation of a pump in crude oil service involves the potential for a release of crude oil in the event of a pump seal failure. Some of the consequences that could result may be:

a) Leak of crude oil into the drain system and then spilling into the sea.

b) Ignition of the crude oil resulting in a small fire around the pump.

c) Inadequate fire fighting equipment due to lack of planning and escalation of the fire to the point where other process equipment fails and a major fire and explosion occurs.


Step 2 Estimate the Severity of each potential Consequence

For each of the identified potential consequences assess the Severity (0 – 5) in the four Consequence categories – people, environment, assets and reputation (PEAR).

In the crude oil pump example above, for the consequence in which crude oil leaks from the pump seal and flows through the drain system into the sea, there could be impacts in 3 Consequence Categories – asset, environment and reputation.


Step 3 Estimate the Likelihood

For each of the potential consequences make an estimate of the Likelihood of the Consequence in terms of the Likelihood levels A to E. The Likelihood level should be judged from past experience, by asking the question: “How often in the past has a hazard release resulted in a Consequence similar to the one that we are considering?”

The approach is one of applying knowledge of historical events to predict the future. Draw on the collective experience around the table and do not confine your thinking to any particular location or company.

The estimate of Likelihood should be based on the Likelihood of the particular Consequence under consideration, not on the Likelihood of the Hazard being realised or incident occurring.

In the example above an estimate should be made of the likelihood of the crude oil pump seal leak resulting in oil into the sea, not the likelihood that the pump seal will leak.


Step 4 Estimate the risk rating

For each potential Consequence determine the risk rating for each of the applicable PEAR categories in terms of the product of the Consequence Severity and the Likelihood. The risk ratings (up to 5 for each potential Consequence) can be plotted on the matrix to provide a visual representation of the risk profile of the hazard release scenario under consideration.

About the Author:

HSE Professional with more than 14 years experience in the Upstream Oil & Gas industry. Created this website to help the HSE Professionals from around the globe to form a sharing and learning community. My inspiration in HSE is a verse from Quran: whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely [Quran, al Maida 5:32]